Following on from the
various statements made by the FIA and McLaren regarding steward-gate, I thought
it might be useful to provide a transcript of what Martin Whitmarsh said in the
press conference yesterday, about the suspension of sporting director Dave
Ryan, Lewis Hamilton's role in misleading the stewards, and the fall out for
McLaren.
Martin Whitmarsh: Obviously I have got to comment on what for our team
is a very sad day today. We have suspended a long standing Sporting Director,
Dave Ryan. I think many people in this room will know Dave and will know of
Dave. He has been with the team for 35 years. I have personally known him for
20 years and I think anyone who knows him, knows that he is a very straight
forward, dedicated, hard working individual. However, it has become clear from
discussions with Dave last night and through into this morning that during the
stewards' meeting he was not entirely full and truthful in answers that he gave
the stewards and consequently we had no alternative today other than to suspend
him. As you can imagine I think it is a very sad day for the team. We have got
to deal with this weekend and we have got to look in a bit more detail at all
of the events that surrounded that. From my perspective obviously it is a point
of deep, deep regret. It is not how I wanted this year in particular to start
and it is something for which the team and myself are not only deeply
embarrassed but deeply regretful. I think for Dave is has been a shattering day
for him.
Q: The impression we are
getting from the statement is that Dave Ryan did this on his own. Are you
telling us that there was no one else involved in McLaren, senior to him, in
this process?
MW: Correct, there was no-one else senior. I think anyone
who knows Dave will know that he did not set out with any deliberate intention
to mislead the stewards. He went to that stewards meeting with Lewis, I am
sure, with the intention of being very clear and straightforward but I think
during the course of that meeting, as we explored it more with him, over the
last 24 hours it became clear that he was not as full and comprehensive as he
could have been.
Q: Could you explain
also what Lewis's precise role was because the stewards made it very clear to
us that both Dave Ryan and Lewis specifically said that the team had not told
them to allow (Jarno) Trulli to go past. So what did Lewis do? Did he follow
Ryan?
MW: I think Dave was the senior member of the team there
and Dave has to take responsibility for leading that process. I think Lewis is
going to talk to the media later and I am sure he will give a full account from
his perspective. But this is something that was still unfolding until literally
minutes before the first practice session. I had to take an incredibly
difficult decision. I have personally known Dave for 20 years. If you go around
this paddock and ask any team in any organisation of their experiences of Dave
in terms of his dedication and commitment, so he is shattered by what has
happened today. We need to take stock of that situation but there were two
people in with the stewards but Dave is part of the management, he is the
Sporting Director of this team, and as such he had the responsibility
to ensure that the stewards received a full and entirely truthful account of
what happened.
Q: You say that Dave was
not entirely truthful in front of the stewards but what about Lewis, was he
truthful in front of the stewards?
MW: No, I think that Lewis was not entirely truthful but
we have spoken to Dave, he was the senior member of the team and they went into
a situation together and I think they were trying to deal with the situation
but they got it wrong. Dave, as the senior member of the team was responsible
for what happened and therefore I took that decision this morning.
Q: What is the procedure
or the process in terms of deciding what was going to be said? You were on the
pit wall and so was Ron Dennis as much as Dave and anyone else. When this
process was unfolding and you knew he had to go to the stewards what was done?
What happens?
MW: In truth the situation was that during this incident
we were asking the stewards, well, we were asking race control, for a decision
because we realised that Trulli had been let past. We did not think that was
right because in fact the original overtake of Trulli was entirely legitimate
as Trulli was not on the circuit. We believed that when all of the facts were
presented to the stewards that they would recognise and they would restore the
positions, so we asked for the race control and the stewards to look into it
and Dave and Lewis went to the stewards to give their account.
Q: But did they talk to
you about what should be said?
MW: No. They did not because it was not necessary. We knew
what had happened and there was a belief that a true and honest account of that
would get the result, that the positions would have been reversed.
Q: So what got lost in
translation? Lewis gave this interview or interviews saying 'I was asked' and
then said 'no' in the stewards' inquiry. Why, why did that happen?
MW: Well, I think Lewis got out of the car and gave a
truthful account of what happened. I believe that whilst they were at the
stewards, Dave, who had been party to what had happened in Spa, was highly
sensitive and I think in the heat of the moment, his judgment was to not give a
true account, and I think Lewis was then led by that.
Q: What is the next
step, given that Dave Ryan has been suspended as opposed to sacked or resigned.
What does that mean, how will that develop?
MW: What it leaves now is that this is something that
happened literally minutes before the first practice session. Dave has been
sent home and we need to, during the course of this weekend, understand exactly
what happened and make the decisions about Dave's future.
Q: Have you given any
consideration to whether you would resign from your role?
MW: I think there's a lot of things going through my mind
today and it's happening during an event in which we're trying to do the best
job we can. I think, as a team, at the moment, we've lost someone who is very
much a significant anchor in this organisation and we've got to make sure that
we pull together to do the best job that we can this weekend. I think we've got
to reflect on everything that's happened over the course of the Australian
weekend, after this race has finished.
Q: So you don't rule
that in or out?
MW: I don't rule anything in or out. I think at the
moment, what we are keen and earnest to do today is make sure that we put our
hands up and say it was a serious error of judgment during that process and
that we make sure that we come clean on that fact.
Q: Have you had the
chance to see the precise words which were spoken between the stewards and your
two team members?
MW: No, I haven't. Ordinarily they aren't minuted and I
believe one of the stewards didn't bring his notebook from Australia but we
have no access to that. All we can do is ask the driver and the team manager
what was said in that meeting.
Q: Where do Lewis and
his manager stand with the team at the moment, how are relations between them
and you and whether their reaction to what's gone on was the factor
in Dave Ryan going and whether it's still a factor in how you're evaluating
your next step as well?
MW: No, it's not a factor. Lewis is not only a very
committed member of the team, he's a longstanding friend of many of us in the
team who have known him since he was a lad. Anthony is similarly well-regarded.
They are solid supporters of the team, consider themselves to be part of it. They
weren't involved in the sad decision with Dave Ryan, they learned after the
event, Lewis didn't know until after P1 this morning. So they had no bearing on
it, they weren't involved in it. We have to manage the business, they know and
understand that and I would say the relationship - at the moment, it's a very
difficult time for the team. We've got to make sure that we come out of it understanding
and learning and hopefully with even stronger relationships than we started
with.
Q: Did you only learn
this morning from Mr Ryan that he was not entirely truthful, because yesterday
when you talked to us, it was something completely different,
and it was after you read what the stewards sent out as a press release that
you saw there was some inconsistency from what you said and what you knew?
MW: I think in these situations people strive to convince
themselves that they have been entirely true and honest in all of their answers
and of course you can technically answer something and convince yourself that
it is truth. Dave was clear that he had not lied and we believed that. As we dealt
with the unfolding situation of yesterday, the more that we discussed it, the
more that we believed that the answers that were given were not full and honest
in the way that we would expect them to be.